Advertisement
"A room of one's own" is difficult to argue with. I like to have my space and not be criticized for how I like to keep my stuff around me. Also, I think it's sexually enticing to be married and still have the "your place or mine?" question hanging in a seductive mood or moment.
Do any of you love and live in separate rooms? I'd love to hear your experiences.
Do any of you love and live in separate rooms? I'd love to hear your experiences.
Advertisement
Advertisement
-
Unsu...
Re: marriage and separate rooms
Mon, October 10, 2005 - 1:50 AMhaving separate rooms was great for my semi-marriage of five years. while lots of folks around us, who had been critical of the separate bedrooms thing, were breaking up left and right, we stayed solid. one thing i noticed is that separate beds people, on the whole, are very respectful people and don't use abusive communication, and they also tend not to take partners for granted. and so, since making love and laying down together was a conscious choice, it made us consciously appreciate each other. separate beds people often have a hard time finding mates, but when they do, it tends to last. -
-
Re: marriage and separate rooms
Tue, October 11, 2005 - 7:40 PMThanks for your reply. Question though: I don't follow you from "semi-marriage of five years" and "we stayed solid." Did you eventually break up? You weren't "really married?" Can you help me understand this better? -
-
Unsu...
Re: marriage and separate rooms
Thu, October 13, 2005 - 10:27 PMI have believed for a long time that marriage is really just a commitment to attempt to have a life-partnership. So once a couple is dating either monogamously, or if they fool around with other people but have a very solid primary relationship around whom they really revolve their lives, then I call it marriage, which, of course, upsets a lot of folks. But once I see through that whatever the reasoning or labeling or technical arrangements are, if the thing looks like an open-ended attempt to stay together for the long term, I call it a marriage. She and I were planning to actually get a legal marriage certificate at some point, depending on how taxes and welfare and other stuff were affected, but after about a year and half, we just started calling each other spouses. And if I have a party and I'm inviting friends to come over, and if they're living with some guy or gal, I just say, "And you're welcome to bring your wife," or, "husband." At first people will be all squirmy about this, but I don't care, since I have to say it the way I see it. I have no hangup against legal marriage or official marriage. A commitment is a commitment, and I can sense it even if the folks involved don't label it that. Put another way, if the people involved can't envision breaking up over any but the most catastrophic problems, then probably they're attempting to stay together forever. This says nothing about whether they will succeed at that, or whether they will ever want to phrase it that way. I'm just an odd critter this way, I suppose. My guess, and it's only a guess, is that monogamy is probably healthier for most people, and I have no resistance to it. But I, for instance, even if I wanted to be "faithful", would only do so because I wanted to be that way for myself. I would never force another person to either love only me or get out of my life. In the case of the woman I lived with, we were technically in an open-relationship, but that was largely a technicality. When you're really committed to someone, who has the time and energy to do all that running around. So the whole thing more or less came off pretty darn traditional.
I remain,
Melvin.
-
-
